Photo Credit: John Lamparski/Getty
Kennedy's campaign has been vocal about the necessity of protection, especially given the historical context of his family. Incidents involving intruders at his residence and armed individuals at campaign events have heightened concerns. The Secret Service, after reviewing numerous threats, has determined that Kennedy is at an elevated risk.
On the flip side, the Biden administration has maintained its stance, with Mayorkas declining the request after consulting the Candidate Protection Advisory Committee. The administration argues that not every presidential candidate receives Secret Service protection, and the decision is influenced by specific criteria and threat assessments.
The eligibility for Secret Service protection is clearly outlined. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3056(a)(7), "major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates," as identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, are eligible. Factors considered include public announcement of candidacy, active national campaigning, threat assessments, and polling thresholds.
Kennedy's campaign contends that he meets these criteria, emphasizing the unique threats he faces. The opposition, however, points to the early stage of his campaign and the lack of a major party nomination as reasons for denial.
This tug-of-war raises questions about the impartiality of the process and the role of personal history in determining security needs. As the debate is still developing, the legal ramifications loom large, with the potential for a court to weigh in on what constitutes "capricious" denial of protection.
